Global Emerging Markets
Lazard Developing Markets
Last updated: 2026-09-03
The Verdict
Lazard Developing Markets charges an expense ratio of 1.56%. On a $100,000 portfolio, that's $1,560 per year in fees, and it scales with the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model tracked it at 88% correlation, for a flat monthly subscription that does not change with portfolio size.
Expense Ratio
1.56%
Star Rating
4/ 5
Market Beta
1.04
Model Correlation
88%
Sharpe Ratio
0.36
Max Drawdown
39.69%
Supreme.PM Cost
Flat monthly subscription
Not a percentage of your assets
Performance
Performance comparison — 1Y: Fund 45.7% vs Model 34.0%; 3Y: Fund 91.7% vs Model 88.2%; 5Y: Fund 38.0% vs Model 65.3%.
Alpha After Fees
Supreme.PM's model achieves 88% correlation with Lazard Developing Markets, providing similar exposure at a flat subscription cost.
Fee Analysis
Lazard Developing Markets charges 1.56% of assets annually. Supreme.PM charges a flat monthly subscription instead, so its cost does not rise as a portfolio grows.
Data sources: Refinitiv Lipper, SEC EDGAR Filings, Supreme.PM Analytics
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Model returns are backtested and may not reflect actual trading conditions.
Related
Global Emerging Markets Category
Browse all Global Emerging Markets funds
Global Emerging Markets Rankings
Top-rated Global Emerging Markets funds
Our Methodology
How we decode fund strategies
Barings Global Emerging Markets
2-star rated
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Opportunities
2-star rated
Ninety One Asia Pacific Franchise
3-star rated
Invesco Emerging Markets ex China Fund (UK)
3-star rated
Scottish Widows Emerging Markets
4-star rated
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the expense ratio of Lazard Developing Markets?
Lazard Developing Markets has an expense ratio of 1.56%, charged as a percentage of the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model is offered for a flat monthly subscription instead.
How does Supreme.PM replicate Lazard Developing Markets?
Supreme.PM builds a transparent, rules-based model of listed securities designed to track this fund's return profile. Over the measured period it tracked the fund closely, at 88% correlation. The model is published in full, so its positions are visible rather than disclosed with a delay.
What are the risks of fund replication?
While our models aim for high correlation, they may not perfectly match the fund's returns due to timing differences in rebalancing, transaction costs, and disclosure delays. Backtested results may not reflect future performance.
Get This Strategy
Start investing with Supreme.PM's decoded model and save on fees while capturing similar returns.