Financials Equity
Guinness Global Money Managers
Last updated: 2026-09-10
The Verdict
Guinness Global Money Managers charges an expense ratio of 1.74%. On a $100,000 portfolio, that's $1,740 per year in fees, and it scales with the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model tracked it at 93% correlation, for a flat monthly subscription that does not change with portfolio size.
Expense Ratio
1.74%
Star Rating
3/ 5
Market Beta
1.34
Model Correlation
93%
Sharpe Ratio
0.44
Max Drawdown
40.08%
Supreme.PM Cost
Flat monthly subscription
Not a percentage of your assets
Performance
Performance comparison — 1Y: Fund 1.2% vs Model 4.2%; 3Y: Fund 59.2% vs Model 79.7%; 5Y: Fund 32.8% vs Model 61.3%.
Alpha After Fees
Supreme.PM's model achieves 93% correlation with Guinness Global Money Managers, providing similar exposure at a flat subscription cost.
Fee Analysis
Guinness Global Money Managers charges 1.74% of assets annually. Supreme.PM charges a flat monthly subscription instead, so its cost does not rise as a portfolio grows.
Data sources: Refinitiv Lipper, SEC EDGAR Filings, Supreme.PM Analytics
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Model returns are backtested and may not reflect actual trading conditions.
Related
Financials Equity Category
Browse all Financials Equity funds
Financials Equity Rankings
Top-rated Financials Equity funds
Our Methodology
How we decode fund strategies
Jupiter Financial Opportunities Fund
3-star rated
Denker Global Financial Fund
4-star rated
Janus Henderson Global Financials
5-star rated
Algebris Financial Equity
5-star rated
Polar Capital Global Insurance
4-star rated
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the expense ratio of Guinness Global Money Managers?
Guinness Global Money Managers has an expense ratio of 1.74%, charged as a percentage of the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model is offered for a flat monthly subscription instead.
How does Supreme.PM replicate Guinness Global Money Managers?
Supreme.PM builds a transparent, rules-based model of listed securities designed to track this fund's return profile. Over the measured period it tracked the fund closely, at 93% correlation. The model is published in full, so its positions are visible rather than disclosed with a delay.
What are the risks of fund replication?
While our models aim for high correlation, they may not perfectly match the fund's returns due to timing differences in rebalancing, transaction costs, and disclosure delays. Backtested results may not reflect future performance.
Get This Strategy
Start investing with Supreme.PM's decoded model and save on fees while capturing similar returns.