Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity
Polar Capital Asia Stars
Last updated: 2026-09-02
The Verdict
Polar Capital Asia Stars charges an expense ratio of 1.38%. On a $100,000 portfolio, that's $1,380 per year in fees, and it scales with the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model tracked it at 86% correlation, for a flat monthly subscription that does not change with portfolio size.
Expense Ratio
1.38%
Star Rating
3/ 5
Market Beta
1.14
Model Correlation
86%
Sharpe Ratio
0.29
Max Drawdown
41.55%
Supreme.PM Cost
Flat monthly subscription
Not a percentage of your assets
Performance
Performance comparison — 1Y: Fund 23.8% vs Model 32.5%; 3Y: Fund 63.5% vs Model 81.4%; 5Y: Fund 18.9% vs Model 35.5%.
Alpha After Fees
Supreme.PM's model achieves 86% correlation with Polar Capital Asia Stars, providing similar exposure at a flat subscription cost.
Fee Analysis
Polar Capital Asia Stars charges 1.38% of assets annually. Supreme.PM charges a flat monthly subscription instead, so its cost does not rise as a portfolio grows.
Data sources: Refinitiv Lipper, SEC EDGAR Filings, Supreme.PM Analytics
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Model returns are backtested and may not reflect actual trading conditions.
Related
Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity Category
Browse all Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity funds
Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity Rankings
Top-rated Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity funds
Our Methodology
How we decode fund strategies
BGF Asian Dragon Fund
3-star rated
Baillie Gifford Pacific
4-star rated
Fidelity Asia
3-star rated
Invesco Asian (UK)
5-star rated
Fidelity Funds - Sustainable Asia Equity
3-star rated
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the expense ratio of Polar Capital Asia Stars?
Polar Capital Asia Stars has an expense ratio of 1.38%, charged as a percentage of the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model is offered for a flat monthly subscription instead.
How does Supreme.PM replicate Polar Capital Asia Stars?
Supreme.PM builds a transparent, rules-based model of listed securities designed to track this fund's return profile. Over the measured period it tracked the fund closely, at 86% correlation. The model is published in full, so its positions are visible rather than disclosed with a delay.
What are the risks of fund replication?
While our models aim for high correlation, they may not perfectly match the fund's returns due to timing differences in rebalancing, transaction costs, and disclosure delays. Backtested results may not reflect future performance.
Get This Strategy
Start investing with Supreme.PM's decoded model and save on fees while capturing similar returns.