Global Small/Mid-Cap
Longleaf Partners Global Fund
Last updated: 2026-09-03
The Verdict
Longleaf Partners Global Fund charges an expense ratio of 1.09%. On a $100,000 portfolio, that's $1,090 per year in fees, and it scales with the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model tracked it at 93% correlation, for a flat monthly subscription that does not change with portfolio size.
Expense Ratio
1.09%
Star Rating
3/ 5
Market Beta
1.25
Model Correlation
93%
Sharpe Ratio
0.19
Max Drawdown
33.60%
Supreme.PM Cost
Flat monthly subscription
Not a percentage of your assets
Performance
Performance comparison — 1Y: Fund 6.2% vs Model 4.2%; 3Y: Fund 37.1% vs Model 42.0%; 5Y: Fund 16.3% vs Model 17.8%.
Alpha After Fees
Supreme.PM's model achieves 93% correlation with Longleaf Partners Global Fund, providing similar exposure at a flat subscription cost.
Fee Analysis
Longleaf Partners Global Fund charges 1.09% of assets annually. Supreme.PM charges a flat monthly subscription instead, so its cost does not rise as a portfolio grows.
Data sources: Refinitiv Lipper, SEC EDGAR Filings, Supreme.PM Analytics
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Model returns are backtested and may not reflect actual trading conditions.
Related
Global Small/Mid-Cap Category
Browse all Global Small/Mid-Cap funds
Global Small/Mid-Cap Rankings
Top-rated Global Small/Mid-Cap funds
Our Methodology
How we decode fund strategies
Yorktown Growth Fund
4-star rated
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap Fund
2-star rated
Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund
3-star rated
Allspring Special Global Small Cap Fund
2-star rated
Invesco Global Opportunities Fund
1-star rated
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the expense ratio of Longleaf Partners Global Fund?
Longleaf Partners Global Fund has an expense ratio of 1.09%, charged as a percentage of the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model is offered for a flat monthly subscription instead.
How does Supreme.PM replicate Longleaf Partners Global Fund?
Supreme.PM builds a transparent, rules-based model of listed securities designed to track this fund's return profile. Over the measured period it tracked the fund closely, at 93% correlation. The model is published in full, so its positions are visible rather than disclosed with a delay.
What are the risks of fund replication?
While our models aim for high correlation, they may not perfectly match the fund's returns due to timing differences in rebalancing, transaction costs, and disclosure delays. Backtested results may not reflect future performance.
Get This Strategy
Start investing with Supreme.PM's decoded model and save on fees while capturing similar returns.