Alternative Energy
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund
Last updated: 2026-09-03
The Verdict
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund charges an expense ratio of 0.88%. On a $100,000 portfolio, that's $880 per year in fees, and it scales with the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model tracked it at 96% correlation, for a flat monthly subscription that does not change with portfolio size.
Expense Ratio
0.88%
Star Rating
3/ 5
Market Beta
0.66
Model Correlation
96%
Sharpe Ratio
0.16
Max Drawdown
42.10%
Supreme.PM Cost
Flat monthly subscription
Not a percentage of your assets
Performance
Performance comparison — 1Y: Fund 27.8% vs Model 29.7%; 3Y: Fund 21.7% vs Model 28.7%; 5Y: Fund 7.2% vs Model 16.1%.
Alpha After Fees
Supreme.PM's model achieves 96% correlation with Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund, providing similar exposure at a flat subscription cost.
Fee Analysis
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund charges 0.88% of assets annually. Supreme.PM charges a flat monthly subscription instead, so its cost does not rise as a portfolio grows.
Data sources: Refinitiv Lipper, SEC EDGAR Filings, Supreme.PM Analytics
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Model returns are backtested and may not reflect actual trading conditions.
Related
Alternative Energy Category
Browse all Alternative Energy funds
Alternative Energy Rankings
Top-rated Alternative Energy funds
Our Methodology
How we decode fund strategies
Luxembourg Selection Active Solar
1-star rated
Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund
2-star rated
BGF Sustainable Energy
4-star rated
Pictet Clean Energy Transition
4-star rated
Guinness Sustainable Energy
3-star rated
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the expense ratio of Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund?
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund has an expense ratio of 0.88%, charged as a percentage of the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model is offered for a flat monthly subscription instead.
How does Supreme.PM replicate Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund?
Supreme.PM builds a transparent, rules-based model of listed securities designed to track this fund's return profile. Over the measured period it tracked the fund closely, at 96% correlation. The model is published in full, so its positions are visible rather than disclosed with a delay.
What are the risks of fund replication?
While our models aim for high correlation, they may not perfectly match the fund's returns due to timing differences in rebalancing, transaction costs, and disclosure delays. Backtested results may not reflect future performance.
Get This Strategy
Start investing with Supreme.PM's decoded model and save on fees while capturing similar returns.