Alternative Energy
Guinness Sustainable Energy
Last updated: 2026-09-02
The Verdict
Guinness Sustainable Energy charges an expense ratio of 1.74%. On a $100,000 portfolio, that's $1,740 per year in fees, and it scales with the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model tracked it at 95% correlation, for a flat monthly subscription that does not change with portfolio size.
Expense Ratio
1.74%
Star Rating
3/ 5
Market Beta
0.69
Model Correlation
95%
Sharpe Ratio
0.12
Max Drawdown
37.60%
Supreme.PM Cost
Flat monthly subscription
Not a percentage of your assets
Performance
Performance comparison — 1Y: Fund 12.6% vs Model 15.9%; 3Y: Fund 5.7% vs Model 12.8%; 5Y: Fund 2.0% vs Model 13.4%.
Alpha After Fees
Supreme.PM's model achieves 95% correlation with Guinness Sustainable Energy, providing similar exposure at a flat subscription cost.
Fee Analysis
Guinness Sustainable Energy charges 1.74% of assets annually. Supreme.PM charges a flat monthly subscription instead, so its cost does not rise as a portfolio grows.
Data sources: Refinitiv Lipper, SEC EDGAR Filings, Supreme.PM Analytics
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Model returns are backtested and may not reflect actual trading conditions.
Related
Alternative Energy Category
Browse all Alternative Energy funds
Alternative Energy Rankings
Top-rated Alternative Energy funds
Our Methodology
How we decode fund strategies
Luxembourg Selection Active Solar
1-star rated
Firsthand Alternative Energy Fund
2-star rated
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund
3-star rated
BGF Sustainable Energy
4-star rated
Pictet Clean Energy Transition
4-star rated
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the expense ratio of Guinness Sustainable Energy?
Guinness Sustainable Energy has an expense ratio of 1.74%, charged as a percentage of the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model is offered for a flat monthly subscription instead.
How does Supreme.PM replicate Guinness Sustainable Energy?
Supreme.PM builds a transparent, rules-based model of listed securities designed to track this fund's return profile. Over the measured period it tracked the fund closely, at 95% correlation. The model is published in full, so its positions are visible rather than disclosed with a delay.
What are the risks of fund replication?
While our models aim for high correlation, they may not perfectly match the fund's returns due to timing differences in rebalancing, transaction costs, and disclosure delays. Backtested results may not reflect future performance.
Get This Strategy
Start investing with Supreme.PM's decoded model and save on fees while capturing similar returns.