Greater China Equity
Schroder Greater China
Last updated: 2026-09-14
The Verdict
Schroder Greater China charges an expense ratio of 1.84%. On a $100,000 portfolio, that's $1,840 per year in fees, and it scales with the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model tracked it at 85% correlation, for a flat monthly subscription that does not change with portfolio size.
Expense Ratio
1.84%
Star Rating
4/ 5
Market Beta
1.03
Model Correlation
85%
Sharpe Ratio
0.06
Max Drawdown
47.41%
Supreme.PM Cost
Flat monthly subscription
Not a percentage of your assets
Performance
Performance comparison — 1Y: Fund 16.8% vs Model 12.1%; 3Y: Fund 43.0% vs Model 60.1%; 5Y: Fund -8.9% vs Model 7.4%.
Alpha After Fees
Supreme.PM's model achieves 85% correlation with Schroder Greater China, providing similar exposure at a flat subscription cost.
Fee Analysis
Schroder Greater China charges 1.84% of assets annually. Supreme.PM charges a flat monthly subscription instead, so its cost does not rise as a portfolio grows.
Data sources: Refinitiv Lipper, SEC EDGAR Filings, Supreme.PM Analytics
Past performance does not guarantee future results. Model returns are backtested and may not reflect actual trading conditions.
Related
Greater China Equity Category
Browse all Greater China Equity funds
Greater China Equity Rankings
Top-rated Greater China Equity funds
Our Methodology
How we decode fund strategies
JPM Greater China
4-star rated
Neuberger Berman China Eq
3-star rated
Guinness Greater China
3-star rated
Janus Henderson China Opportunities
3-star rated
Templeton China
1-star rated
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the expense ratio of Schroder Greater China?
Schroder Greater China has an expense ratio of 1.84%, charged as a percentage of the amount invested. Supreme.PM's decoded model is offered for a flat monthly subscription instead.
How does Supreme.PM replicate Schroder Greater China?
Supreme.PM builds a transparent, rules-based model of listed securities designed to track this fund's return profile. Over the measured period it tracked the fund closely, at 85% correlation. The model is published in full, so its positions are visible rather than disclosed with a delay.
What are the risks of fund replication?
While our models aim for high correlation, they may not perfectly match the fund's returns due to timing differences in rebalancing, transaction costs, and disclosure delays. Backtested results may not reflect future performance.
Get This Strategy
Start investing with Supreme.PM's decoded model and save on fees while capturing similar returns.